THE Government of Barbados is being urged to provide better housing in the already heavily populated City of Bridgetown, rather than increasing housing stock.
Leader of the Opposition, Bishop Joseph Atherley, made this plea during his contribution to the debate in the Lower House, on Tuesday. "One may hold the view that we need more housing in the City; I hold the view that we need better housing in the constituency of The City of Bridgetown... You can go into wider Bridgetown to places like Chapman Lane, Orleans, Nelson Street, Wellington Street areas and I am saying that we got a lot of poor-quality housing located in these areas - within the precincts of Bridgetown and its wider environs," he declared.
"Yes, call for more housing if you would, I would join you with that. But, I think a greater priority is better housing and that ought to be the mantra and motto of this Government.
"We cannot say that the last administration caused an opportunity to be lost in getting improvements of housing in Bridgetown, and we blame them and stop there - the situation still obtains. People live in poverty, in very poor-quality housing - there is hardly any room to breathe between houses in the city and even parts of St. Michael West," he stressed.
In fact, Government's plan to convert the Treasury Building into living facilities did not gain Atherley's support.
He made it clear that the Broad Street, Bridgetown building, which once housed the Barbados Revenue Authority (BRA), was in his view not an appropriate place for housing families, especially if children are involved.
"Now the Treasury Building has been cited as potentially a place for residential occupancy in Bridgetown. I am not schooled in these matters, neither from a safety and security perspective... But it doesn't seem to me as though the Treasury Building site would be the best place in Bridgetown for a residential occupancy community. In a sense that building constitutes an island with traffic all around it, and if you are bringing housing to Bridgetown, perhaps other sites might be considered.
"I have heard that it is to be the site of a particular kind of occupancy. My worry would have been is that if you are locating people in Bridgetown for dwelling, and you put children in a place like that, then you are inviting all kinds of potential hazards if children are going to enter and exit a residential facility such as located in the now unused Treasury Building," Bishop Atherley pointed out.
"If it is for a special brand of occupancy, whatever that is, whether it be bachelor pads or any other type of pad - I hope that it is not intended to be a same-sex pad, because I think that is an issue that Barbadians still have to be heard on - and I am not suggesting that is the intended use." (TL)